so I've seen 1 post by SR that I would associate with normal SR. However, the other posts don't really feel like his wolf game, either. I can't decide what to do with him yet.
Quality of SR's stuff is pretty lacking too. and yep KoD said this exact thing BEFORE me i might add ...this sounds... weird? The rest of Psych's reads sound okay, but the wording on this is very... I don't like it. "Top suspect" for giving an accuser leniency? The rest is interesting. One thing I noticed was that he tended to hedge with most of his reads... that's such a traditional scumtell that I myself pretty much outright avoided it when I could as scum... I should look up if he did that in the Champs game, cause I know we mislynched him there w h a t they're more thought out. this, exactly. Hi, this entire thing is pointless. Or. all of it is except for, interestingly enough, your hard scum read on me. shush i investigated everything i could find and you know it that was at first. BEFORE i investigated it. you lollipop. I don't do that. now, i will finish this later bc thats a hecka lot of messages to eval and this took me 40 minutes.
First off the talk on void contradicts itself. Saying they're pingy is fine but how do you go from wanting to lynch them to gun jumping to they're a villager? That seems like overcompensation just for the sake of it. That process just does not seem natural to me, if you think you're biased because of their playstyle just keep them at null until you have a better picture? Having a pure vibe from dya is fine but it makes some things you say later make little sense which we'll get to. So now we get to the abomination of a read that is psycho's read on jimlad. The first line pings the hell out of me, without even reading the last game I'm not sure how you can say something like this without it sounding like TMI, the way you word it makes it sound like you know his alignment is different than what was last game. Also I'm not sure how you can say jimlad has put in genuine effort when he insinuated me and dya having interactions before I had even posted. That is not the kind of posts made by someone who trying or is even paying attention to what is happening in the game. Next you have a problem with me pointing this out against jimlad but you do it without saying anything about me. You completely dismiss the reasoning I put bad and just say jimlad is a scapegoat. Scapegoat for who though? You said dya was pure and said nothing about me so what does scapegoat even mean in this context? This being said your entire read there feel constructed rather than genuine so yeah I'm going to do this now. VOTE: psycho
Actually you didn't really investigate, you seemed to look for material to reach a conclusion. Investigation might have involved asking me about my cj read at the time
@Dya: Why? I'm not you. For all I know, maybe you were seeking a particular reaction from Jim, or you wanted to be more noticeable to him. All I see is what is presented here in the thread, and you made a stink about him reading you off of only a few posts. Perhaps that irritated you, thus why you would be biased against his content. Hell, you even showcase a bit of bias by saying his read on you was a good example. His content has been more than that on others. His one read on you, that you dislike, just shows what I'm saying about you. @611: I assume the room has no ceiling so it is more welcoming to you. One question though: Why Jake as a penguin? Throwing in an unknown just because it is an unknown? @SR: That's what you call putting a spin on it? Well hell, then you're the one putting a spin on it by assuming Jim even thought Fable was active when he started posting. That while ignoring his own perspective. I'm glad you're projecting though. Makes me feel that much surer about your alignment. And for the record, just because Fable wasn't present doesn't mean there was not an interaction. Course that interaction was based in sillyness, which should be obvious, but that doesn't matter given how focused you are on Jim. The context matters. He skimmed. Fable hadn't posted. Easily could be mistaken as there being an interaction between the two with one voting the other. But let's just ignore context since that seems to be your thing. In either case his impressions were pretty genuine to me. You seeing them as fake reeks of nothing more than just sticking to a shoddy argument you fielded. And yeah, I'm defending him because, again, shoddy argument from you. And Jim has been accurate with what he's been posting about. Either you're not paying attention, or you're hellbent on painting him in whatever negative light helps back you. Ah, that's what you mean. Well hopefully when I tell you this, you'll treat it as real as opposed to fake: the vote is staying on you.
you're usually more detailed in both alignmnts alk you're missing th point. sr isnt pretending to have a lot of reads. so yes, theres little content but what content he has makes sense. jim's content doesnt make sense. wolves will do these types of lists to appear like they are doing work and are therefore towny
most of his reads weren't very good and felt faked. just because i used the obvious example of fable/me doesnt make me biased your defense of him is weird in a bad way. feels like a wolf trying to defend town
If you had been watching when 611 brought it up, it looked like I was the one sheeping. Not the other way around. It seems you're beginning to get jumpy SR. Fearful of getting too much heat, eh?
no. you don't get to define investigation. I'd collated material before I got pinged. I then looked through that material, and posted the bits I felt were relevant. Guess what? I made SURE to include links to everything else, too! So you can't tell me I was trying to purposely cast you in a negative light! I DO my gosh-darned research. And if you were in the Champs game with me, you'd know that I'm not always ABLE to address issues "at the time". That going back repeatedly over these things is how I WORK. Don't get on my case because I brought something up that I'd skipped over before. That's WHY I GO OVER EVERYTHING MULTIPLE TIMES. Try waiting until I'm not rushed. it can't make sense if there's no reasoning behind it. also, it's not just scum who do those types of lists. wouldn't I know this. This. The only reason what I say looks sheepy now is because I had like an hour of lag time, and am only getting to these things after KoD did. That is. The ONLY reason.
His words literally put him as *saying* that Fable had interactions by saying they were having fun and playing around. You're twisting it in every way to try and defend his words when they are blatantly inaccurate. Yes, you are putting a spin on it by trying to gloss over that to instead address a concern that I didn't actually have. Further you keep trying to strawman me here, you're trying to imply that I denied it's based on silliness. That part I never too issue with. It was indeed based on silliness on dya's part. However he very clearly glossed over it and his take seemed pretty fake. It's hard to get 2 posts wrong in such a way that you think someone that didn't post has somehow had an interaction Sure, the context matters. He skimmed. No, skimming doesn't make you hallucinate posts that didn't happen from someone who hasn't posted. Believing that someone who posted hasn't isn't very genuine but you seem to be ignoring any and all reality here anyways.
@Alk: I'd just like to say we are definitely on the same wavelength. It scares me because I'm not used to this. Kind of. Well, there's one person I like to mindmeld with, but you're not him.
If I could figure out how the heck you upload images here, I have the perfect GIF for this It's also literally the only GIF on my computer... Actually, he kinda does get to define it, to get clarification and understanding about what you mean
