yes, but I knew he was a wolf then...and I was his lost wolf. So that's a different situation. here, with a newer player, I think it looks good. do you agree?
i think the tone and the implication is good. alk changed their mind and void immediately picked up on it and questioned it aggressively
I feel sure you wouldn't be so uncertain if you had outside information from Penguin sources. Might change. But I'm fairly sure you're innocent. Mmmit's hard to say exactly. But I got a hunch, and looking back over your posts, they've been rather few and lacking in substance... Why don't you like the spin KoD is putting on this? Okay. Jimlad's read on 611, here: Is not something that you can simply say you "don't like". It was based on actual history, which is a GOOD thing, and a SOLID case, and something you need to come up with an actual POINT in order to refute. This is what Jim said about dyachei and Fable. Plus, you give no reason for disliking Cj, though I'll get to HIM later! Moving on for now. Not sure what to think of this actually, but it doesn't really give any useful info or reasons. plus, I'm fairly sure you could check from Fable's profile that he hasn't been around today at all. also literally what wolf would give something like that away noncommittal post. how charming. So, to bring this all together: In my multiple rereads of the thread so far, I've refocused on you, SR, and you have been found wanting. This is why I asked Kam for meta on you: because I wasn't sure if this was truly wolfy behavior or just idiosyncrasy. But in the absence of any justification... it looks pretty bad, to me. This is why I voted you. Ohi Fable.
Zebelby's It's meant to be quick Which reminds me What are they normally here? I never paid attention, I just played the game.
eh, alk. you're missing the part where jim said "messing with each other". I think that's where SR is stuck. I'm stuck on how that's his only read of me because it feels faked.
611 - because I've played like 1 game with you. if SR or fable said my tone was weird, I would understand. But your knowledge of my tone is suspect to me
@Rev: Yes, from the guy who skimmed a lot. As I more or less stated, he was accurate about the playfulness if incorrect about how many were being playful. That's easily explained when you skim and don't have people posting a lot (or at all). And what shift? From voting Psycho to voting you?
ftr still not home yet and my phone is about to die (26%) but figured I'd pop in and interact for a bit. I am caught up and so far Jim looks the worst to me just because I don't think he's actually reading and his reads come across as fake as a result.
It's a general feel for tone. It came across as more bitey, something which Mafiascum classifies as a scum tell on their wiki, so no, I don't think me reading tone on a player who I have played one game with is odd
Dya and KoD probably villagers but not sure if those are biased due to me having meta on them and nobody else this game besides SR who I'm null on.
I feel like individuals have individual tone, though. So i hate ascribing tone reads universally. For instance, fable is usually kind of pushier as town than as a wolf. that might be wolf read by some people, but for him, its towny
