I love new votes. 8 votes to majority. Not Voting - Ren Fox, Dipdoo, Surenu, Jirky-Kake, Inf_Wolf14, Dragonclaw, The Squid Firebird Zoom - HunterC1998 zeskorion - 611 Ren Fox - Charlatan, Apathy Applied Dipdoo - Zebe Zebe - Firebird Zoom Charlatan - zeskorion
I feel like when things get like this it feels like a western. "You're the one that killed my wife." Holds up gun "There's no way, you've got the wrong man!" "You sure look like 'em" lights cigarette "We ain't movin' till the sherif gets here." I see you lurking Hunter, get out here and say what you think.
Wait me? Well, my top 3 on the radar are Zesko, Charlatan and Zoom..And I kinda have been fading a bit cause it's late..
I may be biased here because I know Charlatan pretty well, but I don't think he seemed insincere here. Then again, I was wrong with suspecting 611 for a while, so take everything I say with a grain of salt.
Imagine if not voting was a person... they'd be dead. And this is my fourth post by the way. And now I have to go. Again.
Just a side note 14 people. 4 monsters, 10 civIlians. A random lynch yields roughly 28.5% to remove a monster. 71.5% to get a civilian. Don't forget roles like shadow, too. (lol I did) Civilians need to kill all monsters. The chance of randomly, and perfectly killing all monsters is less than 1%. The monsters don't have to guess. They just have to lynch everyone who isn't a monster. They can even pervent themselves from dying by nullifing a lynch via making the votes equal. But it's not as a simple as that. We could win in 4 days, and they, 10. We have 2 and a half times more votes. Just take note that, as soon as there are only 4 civilians, there's only one logical choice (not taking in effects of roles). This is because we can't privately communicate, but they can. All 4 civilians must ALL agree on a single monster, otherwise, they can all vote on one single person. Once there's only 3 survivors, it's a guaranteed loss, not including roles.
I'm getting a bit suspicious of Hunter. I don't know why, but I just am. I'm also suspicious of the people who aren't voting. They could be trying to hide and not draw too much attention. As for me though, I just don't vote. I don't think I have in any Penguin Games. You can look.
I typically don't vote until I feel sure about who I'm voting against. Everything right now is just setting up the dots so I can connect them later. Maybe.
I definitely think I'm taking this game far too seriously. It reminds me of fencing. You block and dodge certain arguements and notions and find a mistake and act on it. Just as cutthroat. I think I accelerated the seriousness of this game from the start. I'm going to a little more calm and reserved. A made an entire spreadsheet of all the players. It surprisingly took me awhile to realize how obsessed I was with winning. Gonna stop now... .___.
You need a break. If you made a spreadsheet, you need a day off. You've made all your necessary posts.
*chews slowly on Tabasco* Hmm. Mmm. Not very fond of the Ren Fox lynch, but I'm also definitely not comfortable with lynching Dipdoo or Charlie. (I'm gonna call you Charlie from now on Charlatan.) I'd much rather remove Zesk. Or Zeberoid. But Zesk itches me much more.
Give me something more than an itch, my arm is getting tired and I'd like something moor productive than standing around. Ren is doing things I myself have done on both sides before. I'm 50/50 which is more than I am about anyone else. Zebe has been pretty quiet, though last time he was on the baddie side he talked quite a bit. I'm impartial about Charlatan, though if it helps progress things then I'll be on board. Zesk has been way too quite. Though he did say he was going to play differently before the game began. Still, he needs to speak up.
I'd prefer waiting a night. Letting investigative people/roles get some solid info overnight to help us sort who to string up, while letting the protective people/roles do their job of keeping definite town (611) and other helpful people alive.
