As much as I think the graphics are terrible (seems like it's made by a 12 year old that just figured out what breasts are), I'm not for censoring. I'd rather this nightmare be buried normally, But the censorship keeps this thing stuck in my view.
I second this, perhaps the mod's creator could upload the mods there without the hassle of dealing with censorship.
The ones currently available are still too tame for nexusmods. I may make something else that would be a better fit for nexus in the future though.
Still a shame for the current slutty version to just waste. I mean you have put some work in it so it's a shame.
Even so, could you please put them somewhere? I managed to get Penny before the hammer struck and would like to get the rest if/when they're available.
+1 for that and ultra slutty anime penny. Though I am liking my ultra slutty penny. I will have to compare. Tough decision are ahead
Please keep in mind that the age requirement for this forum is 13+. Given that, I'd say we're still fairly lenient about what is allowed here. There's a mod for Starbound that gives all female characters larger breasts, and the tone of the mod description is quite neutral and respectful and the content isn't pornographic, so it's allowed to stay. Respriting all of the bachelorettes in Stardew Valley to have larger breasts and more revealing outfits and then labelling them "slutty" isn't appropriate. Our moderators saw this and the borderline nudity of some of the sprites in question and removed them from the original post. They were doing what they were supposed to do. You're free to create whatever you'd like, but we aren't under any obligation to allow you to post it or distribute it here. There are lots of other places you can distribute the content we've deemed inappropriate for our audience. Happy to answer any questions in the morning, because it's getting late here. Please keep the discussion civil.
Okay, I guess I'll have to modify the sprites to be similar to the Starbound mod you've posted and rename it to something more conservative.
Have a nice sleep. A few questions. Will the mods be allowed to be resubmitted in an altered state? You say the mods were removed for the term slutty and "borderline nudity" okay well its been confirmed that penny ultra slutty did have nudity so was removed. Abigail was removed but due to your reason it was due to the term slutty and borderline nudity.. borderline nudity is different from nudity which your forum rules do not permit... So Abigail should be restored in its original form-sans the term slutty. The most important question is The suit said he was not allowed to alter this thread in any way, to either remove or restore since he was waiting on you. Is this true? If it is true and you are the only one with the power-besides the creator- to remove posts.. Then explain to me why penny 1.a cleavage mod is still on the first page..when it has nudity on it that is visible. If you are leaving this up then you can see where one might be inclined to say you guys are saving face and covering one another's action. There is still offending content that has not been removed due to the same reasons you stated. Edit: "Borderline nudity" and nudity are two different things.. If you are claiming the mods were removed for borderline nudity then you have to update your forum rules to reflect that. Since its not stated you can just "flex" the rules so to speak.
I'm gonna repost them now with a modified name. The only difference will be Penny, I've changed the offending 9 pixels.
Ok, I'm still awake. Or you could just post what you've made already somewhere else, for a more adult-oriented audience! There's no such thing as "too tame for Nexus", unless something has drastically changed over there since the last time I downloaded Fallout 4 mods. I don't think there is a minimum boob requirement. The mod can be submitted here in an altered state. Our forum rules are there to give a general idea of what not to post, but they don't cover absolutely everything and they aren't meant to. Sometimes something new and unexpected and controversial happens that requires us to use our best judgment to make a decision that we feel is right for our community, but doesn't necessarily fit neatly into this thread. If you want to really get into that whole discussion though, you should read our Terms and Rules, section 2, "Responsibility of contributors". Here's a snippet: "Without limiting any of those representations or warranties above, Chucklefish has the right (though not the obligation) to, in Chucklefish’s sole discretion (i) refuse or remove any content that, in Chucklefish’s reasonable opinion, violates any Chucklefish policy or is in any way harmful or objectionable, or (ii) terminate or deny access to and use of the Website to any individual or entity for any reason, in Chucklefish’s sole discretion." This isn't anything particular to us - it is a standard Terms and Rules agreement for an online community. I also think you're perhaps reading into the situation slightly too much. Moderators are perfectly able to edit/remove content, same as me. The Suit chose not to because things were getting a bit heated in here and he wanted me to weigh in, so I did. I don't have any interest in covering up anyone's actions, but I'm also not really sure what actions I would even be covering up. I hope that helps to explain a bunch of stuff!
Certainly does, thanks for that Molly. I would like to know what exactly makes it okay for forum moderators to passive-aggressively threaten members of the community baselessly though. Suit was implying that a particular tone was being aimed at him when it's clear from reading the message this is in response to, no such thing was present. While this whole thing was blown up more than it needed to be, this was the one thing that stuck throughout for me and I'm honestly a little concerned that simply trying to explain something to a moderator can result in someone potentially being punished.
