To win, I guess we can just bombard and flood the thread with spam until somebody gets really pissed off and bans us. It's still RNG whether or not will the mod close the thread though.
Come to think of it, what's prolly worse when a mod closes the thread is when he/she makes a formal post about it beforehand. Essentially, that person would win. I think it's an unfair system and I would like to propose that whoever posts before a mod prior to closing the thread, wins. Unless mod #2 decides to close it, and I think the win count for mod #1 should only apply if he gets scolded by #2.
Why are you using two underscores for the mouth it looks like a bored frog! I believe that is too long and I suggest you edit your post! I just read the first post and if the previous thread is gone, how will we ever know who'll win this one assuming this also goes poof? Suddenly I feel like I've lost my purpose in this world and one of the hardest questions in life I've ever pondered at had just gotten blurrier. I guess I could just search for the thread, but that would more or less force me to edit this post.
the Realest Real that has ever been Realed in iirc that post referred to a time when the forums were hacked or something. Bunch of threads were deleted, including the original Last Post Wins
